今晚直播目錄出爐囉~
2:43 談一下高雄氣爆
4:22 先看看它他她~~
PArt One 疫情更新
6:31 不看先猜,又一人不是因喵喵而死
-還記得昨晚分享打喵喵後的5個心肌炎症狀
10:10 我只知我阿嬤,得糖尿病,可活到90多歲
11:32 其實阿,怎麼看都是國外喵喵毒;怎不見反對黨提龍劭華事件?雙標喔~
13:15 AZ背後金主居然是Google,難怪!搜尋不到不利喵喵訊息
16:35 就是打AZ,然後日本媽媽又要送50萬劑惹
-但免驚,最近病毒會很乖的,指揮中心要鬆綁了耶
-侯友宜宣布:新北明天起恢復餐飲內用
20:51 網友說:王大濕一定會說,符合我預測.....牙~
-那為何還打XX?
22:44 一天不到就有結論,拉法葉艦案30年,找不到兇手;新冠兩年找不到源頭
Part Two 中美台關係
24:06 布林肯重申對台承諾、萬安演習、怕的要死
27:50 「考量」台灣代表處才兩天,CFR馬上說,錯誤政策
-866億魚叉飛彈照樣繳,但正名免談
-好啦,那就免費送個「立陶宛台灣代表處」好了
-雞腿吃不到,送個雞南佛好了
先進入你斗內、我回答:
31:30 感謝斗內大德夢幻植物:大濕濕你好,如果李登輝是偏統派,蔣經國為何交棒給他?另外請問郝柏村呢?當年他接任行政院長也是被稱軍閥頭子,國際橋牌社影片中有一段一直在爭議中華民國派與台灣派?國民黨親江派,民進黨親習派?請大濕濕分析
-不該說偏統派,而是說「非獨派」
-岩理不愛中華民國,與江合作,去過畢德堡會議,他是什麼?
-只能說郝與李都葬在五指山,不會太敵對
-KMT親誰,可看連家,2014年北市大選,習大居然...
-DPP親誰,可看蔡家,2016、2020大選,習大居然...
-但也不能這樣說,其實派系不重要,端看誰執政
56:57 感謝斗內大德陳大媽:請問大師認為豬妹說的美國金融大重整會發生嗎?前兩天她也跟大師一樣說川爺會在金融崩潰後回歸,只是她說還要大家再祈禱20天,如果美國金融大重整,+就差不多世界末日了吧,如果是這樣,世界倒不如給DS管算了。
感謝斗內大德林大貓:純斗
1:23:00 感謝斗內大德Morris:若不是大師,我不會知道豬妹和小明,他們都有幾分假,唯大師是來真的、而且接地氣,其他人就聽聽就好,必須自己判斷。想問~口罩明顯不利於人臉辨識,有沒有可能,黑帽其實是白帽,戴口罩可防chemtrail?
感謝斗內大德Rocky You
感謝斗內大德孫俊偉
感謝斗內大德Stanley Chang
感謝斗內大德Verna Liu
PArt Three 國際政經
1:11:40 蔡英文太空計畫,腦控、氣候工程國家隊?
1:13:38 通膨「又」神秘放緩了!Fed又有機會鴿派了
-美元又跌了,殖利率崩跌、金價又回1800!有完沒完?
-但實際上,天然氣漲35趴;油價也漲;美通膨預期升溫
-那8月通膨,是否有亂調過?
1:18:23 恆大破產,會成黑天鵝嗎?安啦,台灣曝險少
-中國房地產指數Q2為149、年增率4.47趴、陸股也在高點
-所以我一直說,9月黑天鵝不大會,是白天鵝
直播網址:https://youtu.be/7RbnXtfR3i4
優質內容,需要您們的贊助!
贊助連結: https://p.ecpay.com.tw/B7CB5 (留言不可空格、分段)
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過5萬的網紅chris wong,也在其Youtube影片中提到,https://www.facebook.com/%E8%A9%A6%E5%9C%96%E8%A7%A3%E5%AF%86-460220011142143/?epa=SEARCH_BOX...
cfr 2020 在 On8 Channel - 岸仔 頻道 Facebook 的最佳解答
The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization
Issued on: July 14, 2020
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China.
China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong.
I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat.
In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order:
Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States.
Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes:
(a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note);
(b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively);
(c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);
(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));
(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and
(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.
Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to:
(a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China;
(b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders;
(c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China;
(d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order;
(e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121);
(f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418);
(g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies;
(h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109);
(i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong;
(j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892);
(k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and
(l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong.
Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:
(i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region;
(ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:
(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong;
(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong;
(C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or
(D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong;
(iii) to be or have been a leader or official of:
(A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii)
(B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or
(B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section;
(v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or
(vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.
Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order.
Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693.
Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and
(d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age.
Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order.
Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.
Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).
Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 14, 2020.
cfr 2020 在 沃草 Watchout Facebook 的最佳解答
抓到了!中國金援統促黨和國民黨樁腳,支持韓國瑜選總統
在台灣總統大選選舉期間,中華統一促進黨不分區立委候選人何建華,涉招待中配出國旅遊、免費提供食宿機票,涉賄選遭起訴,今(8)日台北地檢署清查出,金援何建華的就是中國湖南省長沙市台辦經濟處處長黃道年!而且黃道年還透過台商替國民黨及其總統候選人 #韓國瑜 賄選,長沙市台協的另外 7 名成員也因違反《總統副總統選舉罷免法》同樣遭到起訴;未到案的長沙市台協會員連上銘則被發布通緝。《自由時報》報導,長沙市台協以招待食宿及機票、舉辦餐會等方式,動員超過 600 名台商及留學生回台投票,支持國民黨所推派的總統及立委候選人。
幾天前,才爆出新北市新莊區中宏里的里長洪少欽在台灣總統大選期間帶其他新莊區的里長組團到中國旅遊,行程食宿由南京市台辦免費招待,南京市台辦人員向團員們提出「幫忙國民黨選上」的要求,要團員支持符合九二共識的政黨,1 月選舉要支持新北市國民黨籍的2位立委候選人,洪少欽因此遭到新北地檢署認定此為「中資介入台灣選舉」,依違反選罷法起訴。
中國用免費招待的 #統戰旅遊 來進行滲透、干預選舉,已經行之有年,在去年中國資訊戰的對台灣的大舉進攻中,也引起了外媒和外國智庫的注意!
美國知名智庫胡佛研究所在 2018 年就在 #胡佛報告 中揭露中國利用民主國家的自由,用各種軟性、看似「無害」的文化活動包裹統戰意圖。在台灣,最常見的軟性統戰就是免費招待旅遊,所有團員都只要自付機票就能成行(或是連機票都招待)。也許有人認為這和統戰畫上等號未免「反應過度」,但統戰的重點就是「朋友要多、敵人要少」,中國不要求立即回報但放眼未來,看似是不經濟的作法,卻悄悄增加民間對中國的好感,塑造「中國很進步」、「中國很漂亮」的好印象。
👉美智庫《胡佛報告》警告:中國利用民主輸出專制 你知道被招待旅遊也是中國統戰嗎?
https://waa.tw/az64HY
《路透社》也報導揭露統促黨等統戰團體在台灣的計畫。這些促統組織,除了到鄉村宣揚一國兩制、辦活動擴張「紅軍」,更對《路透社》的記者坦白的說要全力支持中國國民黨,要在 2020 年的總統大選拉下蔡英文!臺灣國安單位官員也表示:「統促黨在台灣已有 60,000 名成員,而且他們有能力動員這些人。」、「如果兩岸發生戰爭,這些人會造成極大的不確定性,這讓人非常恐懼。」
👉《路透社》揭露統促黨、愛國同心會在台工作三大目標:宣揚一國兩制、擴張「紅軍」、拉下蔡英文
https://waa.tw/qHLKrV
美國重量級智庫 Council on Foreign Relations(CFR)的報告也指出,在大選期間,中國企圖透過海量的假消息,藉此削弱台灣人對政府和執政黨的信任、散播失敗主義、在台灣引起混亂,進一步打擊現任總統蔡英文的選情,目的就是扶植中國屬意的候選人、現任高雄市長韓國瑜上台!中國國民黨向來樂意接受「台灣是中國神聖不可分割的一部分」這種主張,身為台灣第二大城市高雄市長的韓國瑜更是支持加強兩岸的連結,在韓國瑜上任市長後短短幾個月內就已經好幾次到中國面見中國共產黨的官員!
👉美國智庫警告:中國假資訊全面入侵台灣,意在拉下蔡英文、扶植韓國瑜
https://waa.tw/O4zokZ
大選已經結束,中國的滲透和資訊戰這次沒能得逞,但是對台灣的攻擊和惡意仍然沒有一天停止。現在相關單位積極調查、起訴這些中資干預選舉的案件,但更重要的是,珍惜我們現在生活方式的台灣人,一定要保持警覺,不要一直抱持「這沒什麼大不了」、「政治歸政治,XX歸XX」的心態,結果卻姑息了中國對台灣的野心!要知道,對中國共產黨而言,人民生活裡看似無關緊要的小事,都是可以操作政治的空間呀!
相關報導:
抓到了!中國湖南省台辦助韓國瑜、國民黨賄選 北檢今起訴7人
https://waa.tw/vwDY7p
中資介入選舉 里長被起訴
https://waa.tw/wF2NI3
#沃草告急 #定期定額募集中
💪 每月 199 元,留下守護台灣的力量! https://waa.tw/fRm7DF
FB_watchout.tw|[email protected]|TW_watchoutTW
cfr 2020 在 Cannondale Factory Racing - Introducing The 2021 CFR Team 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>